BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-// - ECPv6.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://beccle.no
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Oslo
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Oslo:20261001T101500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Oslo:20261001T113000
DTSTAMP:20260907T130517Z
CREATED:20260907T130517Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260907T130517Z
UID:7949-1790849700-1790854200@beccle.no
SUMMARY:Google Android – The Final Word from the European Court of Justice
DESCRIPTION:THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE REJECTED GOOGLE’S APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT AND CONFIRMED THE PENALTY IMPOSED FOR GOOGLE’S ABUSE OF DOMINANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ANDROID OPERATING SYSTEM \nThomas Vinje\, Professor II on the Faculty of Law at UiB and Chair Emeritus of Clifford Chance’s Global Antitrust Group\, visits BECCLE to discuss the key issues addressed by the Court in case C-738/22 P\, Google Android. He will be joined by Katharine Missenden\, Counsel at Clifford Chance Brussels. \n  \n  \n  \nThomas and Katharine will focus on the key issues of principle at issue on the appeal\, including \n\nTo prove an Article 102 infringement\, must the Commission undertake a (but-for) counterfactual analysis proving what the competitive situation would have been had the dominant company not engaged in the contested conduct?\nTo establish an Article 102 infringement\, are the Commission (and the General Court) systematically required to extend their examination beyond the capacity of the dominant player’s conduct to restrict competition and to assess whether that conduct was capable specifically of foreclosing competitors as efficient as the dominant company?\nIn establishing infringement\, must the entire factual and commercial context be taken into account in assessing whether an abuse has occurred – including conduct that has itself been found not to be abusive?\n\nThomas filed the complaint on behalf of FairSearch against Google that led the European Commission to pursue its case against Google on its Android-related conduct.  He pursued the complaint throughout the administrative proceedings leading to the Commission’s decision against Google and represented FairSearch in support of the European Commission in Google’s appeal before the General Court and Court of Justice of the European Union.  Katharine worked with Thomas on the appeals before both European Courts. \nLocation: Faculty of Law\, University of Bergen\, Auditorium 3\nWhen: Thursday 1. October\,  10:15-11.30 \nThe seminar will be streamed and a zoom link will come here:
URL:https://beccle.no/event/google-android-the-final-word-from-the-european-court-of-justice/
LOCATION:Auditorium 3\, Det juridiske fakultet\, UiB\, Magnus Lagabøtes plass 1\, Bergen\, Norway
CATEGORIES:Events,Seminar
ORGANIZER;CN="Ronny Gjendemsj%C3%B8":MAILTO:ronny.gjendemsjo@uib.no
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR